Shanghai community owners pull the banner of "Dead People’s Hospital" to protest against the construction of nursing homes. Media: Don’t be old if you dare.

An unfinished nursing home, banners with fierce words, and a long-standing contradiction made the official WeChat of China News Network have such a title: "Nursing home = a hospital for the dead?" Don’t be old if you dare! 》

It turns out that something unpleasant happened in a residential area in Shanghai these days. The government wants to build a nursing home in the community, but it is strongly opposed by the owners. Some radical owners actually put up banners to protest, which read the words "Get out of the community in the hospital for the dead", which made people shudder.

Recently, banners such as "protesting against the construction of nursing homes in residential areas" can be seen everywhere in Xinyi Yayuan Community, Yangpu District, Shanghai. This year, a company in Shanghai prepared to transform the idle buildings in the community into public and private nursing homes, but it was strongly opposed by the community owners, and some community owners even hung up the "Dead People’s Home" and got out of the community.

Slogans against the construction of nursing homes can be seen everywhere in the community. Manager Lu, the project leader of this company, told the reporter that considering that Shanghai is getting more and more aging, Yangpu District is a traditional old industrial area with concentrated retired workers and a shortage of old-age care institutions, the company considered converting idle buildings into nursing homes last year after market research and communication with its streets. The project is expected to invest 30 million yuan, and the number of old-age beds will be about 291 after completion.

There are two main reasons for the owners’ opposition: first, it lowers the housing price of the community and affects the interests of the owners; Second, there are hospice wards and mortuaries in nursing homes, which affect the living environment and the psychology of owners. Because there is a saying among the owners that there are 1200 beds in this nursing home, there must be a morgue. They said: It is not always comfortable to open the window and see the nursing home. The street said that last year, it was considered to transform idle buildings into nursing homes. After the completion, the actual number of beds for the elderly was about 291.

After reading this news, Xiaoxin’s mind immediately came up with a scene. A high-end restaurant is crowded, but the seat next to the toilet is empty. No one wants to sit near the toilet to eat, but no one protests that the restaurant should not build this toilet, because everyone who eats will inevitably need it.

When people’s livelihood infrastructure conflicts with personal interests, what should we do? Is it true that nursing homes embodying humanistic care have no place in residential areas? If we don’t build a nursing home now, where will we live when we are old? Before answering these questions, let’s take a look at the status quo of nursing homes.

Present situation of nursing homes in China

According to the statistics of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, as of the end of March 2015, there were 31,833 registered pension service institutions in China. The total number of beds for the aged in institutions and communities reached 5.84 million, up 19.7% year-on-year, including 1.973 million beds for residential and day care in communities. At present, there are 27.5 beds for the aged per 1,000 elderly people, up 10.0% year-on-year.

With the accelerated arrival of an aging society, the living conditions, pension rights and security of the elderly have attracted increasing attention from all walks of life. Recently, in some places, cases of injury to the elderly have occurred one after another, or accidents that accidentally lead to the disability and death of the elderly have caused public concern about the security risks of the old-age service institutions.

How to solve the contradiction between the owner and the street?

The main concern of the owners is nothing more than two points:

First, I am afraid that house prices will fall. Imagine that if a residential area is equipped with a nursing home, just like a kindergarten, a vegetable market and a hotel in the residential area, this kind of welfare facilities that are convenient for the people will not let the house prices fall, but will only facilitate the owners, so this kind of worry is superfluous;

Second, the owners are worried that there are 1200 beds in nursing homes, and there will often be dead people, which will affect Feng Shui. The street clearly stated that it planned to build 291 beds, which is a reflection of the poor communication between the owners and the street. The street should have a detailed explanation and discussion with the owners’ committee, put all possible problems on the table and seek common ground while reserving differences. For example, where is the activity area of the old people? Whether the old people will disturb the people and other issues should be dealt with in advance …

Social needs of the elderly

First, why do the elderly live in nursing homes?

1) Hope to get timely nursing and medical assistance;

2) Reduce the burden of care for children and other family members;

3) Enjoy the old age;

4) Get rid of loneliness.

Second, what will be considered when living in a nursing home?

1) Location environment;

2) check-in fee. At present, the expenses paid by the elderly mainly come from their own pension, children’s sponsorship and funds for renting or selling their original houses.

3) medical conditions. Most concerned about the "first aid channel"; I hope that the medical environment will be warm and the service personalized.

4) service demand. Nursing staff should be patient and respectful; It is very important to visit and patrol regularly; Provide health care services, and organize health care and outing activities.

5) Dietary conditions. The dining environment is diversified and humanized; Varieties should be differentiated and can take care of special needs; I hope to set up a hospitality restaurant and a public kitchen.

"The distance between a bowl of soup"

Some people say that nursing homes can be built, but why should they be built in residential areas? In fact, one word is often used to choose the address of the old-age care institution-"the distance of a bowl of soup", that is to say, this bowl of soup is cooked from home and brought to the nursing home for the elderly to drink, which just doesn’t cool off. This distance is the best.

Building a nursing home in a residential area can just make the communication between children and the elderly closer. As the old saying goes, "all the virtues’s filial piety comes first". Filial piety is a precious treasure handed down by the Chinese nation for thousands of years. Who can say that he is not old? If children have time to take care of the elderly, or let them live in their own homes, this is the best state, but the reality is often unsatisfactory. Let the elderly have a sense of security in nursing homes, and focus on the long distance, and their grievances will not be so heavy, don’t you think?

[background news]

A residential area in Shanghai wants to build a nursing home. The owner pulls a banner "Home for the Dead"

Xinmin. com In recent years, Shanghai has made great efforts to develop the cause of providing for the aged. The municipal government regards adding new beds for the aged as a practical matter for the municipal government every year, and this year’s target is 7,000 beds. However, a nursing home, from planning and design, project approval to construction, acceptance and approval, and finally opening the door to welcome the elderly, is not as simple as the increase in numbers on paper, and some will encounter unexpected difficulties and even obstacles. Recently, a nursing home for ordinary elderly people in Yangpu District and Fengxian District suffered from "birth difficulties", and the reporter went to investigate it in depth.

A wall is separated by mourning and wailing?

No.3531 Zhoujiazui Road is near Longchang Road. When the reporter came here, he saw the door closed. After explaining the purpose, the doorman opened the iron gate and said that it had been shut down for more than two months. The reporter saw that there were two old buildings with five floors and six floors, and the renovation project was halfway completed, and no one was there. Across the wall, there are some shacks on one side, and a six-story husband’s house and several high-rise residential buildings on the other. High-rise residential buildings face the construction site with a banner: "Dead people’s homes get out of the community!" " I was shocked to see it.

The main objections of the owners are as follows: First, it lowers the housing price of the community and affects the immediate interests of the owners; Second, there are hospice wards and mortuaries in nursing homes, which affect the living environment and the psychology of owners.

This is the second nursing home in Yanji under construction.

The plot at No.3531 Zhoujiazui Road belongs to Shanghai Yidian Group. In the past few years, the building was leased to Shanghai Publishing and Printing College for use as a student dormitory. After the student dormitory moved out in 2013, it was vacant. Now it is managed by Shanghai Cangxin Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Yidian Group. Manager Lu, the person in charge of the company’s project, told the reporter that considering Shanghai’s aging degree is getting higher and higher, Yangpu District is a traditional old industrial area with concentrated retired workers and a shortage of old-age care institutions, the company considered converting idle buildings into nursing homes last year after market research and communication with its streets. There is only one public nursing home in Yanji Street, and I hope to build another one, but there is no space. The idea of Cangxin Company hit it off with them. Yangpu district government also attaches great importance to this and confirms that the nature of nursing homes is public and private. The project is expected to invest 30 million yuan, and the number of old-age beds will be about 291 after completion.

On March 20th this year, after completing all the necessary procedures, the renovation project started. However, more than a month later, residents came to the streets and governments at all levels again and again to resolutely oppose the construction of nursing homes. On May 6th, at the strong demand of residents, the renovation project had to be suspended. Yanji Street, District Civil Affairs Bureau, District Housing Management Bureau, District Diplomatic Relations Committee and other departments held many forums and coordination meetings to communicate and talk with residents, but the results were not great.

Most of the residents who oppose the construction of nursing homes are the owners of nearby favorite yayuan. This is a commercial housing community built in 2002, with more than 200 households. Walking into the community, banners such as "opposing the construction of nursing homes in residential areas" and "opposing the infringement of owners’ rights and interests" can be seen everywhere. The reporter interviewed an owner, Ms. Li, who told the reporter the main objections of the owners: First, it lowered the housing price of the community and affected the immediate interests of the owners; Second, there are hospice wards and mortuaries in nursing homes, which affect the living environment and the psychology of owners.

A resident wrote in a letter to a government department: "A wall separates us from the mortuary, but we hear the wailing and weeping of the family members of the deceased in our ears, and the polluted air in the ward is breathed in our mouths and noses … hundreds of households are within reach of death …" Because there is a saying among the owners that this nursing home has 1,200 beds, it is sure to set up a mortuary.

The Ministry of Commerce responded to the US-led "Chip Quartet Alliance": any framework arrangement should be inclusive and open.

CCTV News:A few days ago, it was reported that the US government was asking South Korea to reply whether to join the "Four-Party Alliance of Chips" led by the US before August. The South Korean side indicated that it was discussing with the US ways to strengthen cooperation in chip manufacturing. At the regular press conference held by the Ministry of Commerce today (July 21st), some media asked the Ministry of Commerce what comments it had on this development and how it viewed the possible impact of the alliance on China’s semiconductor industry. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce responded.

Shu Yuting, spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce:The stability of industrial chain supply chain is a global issue of great concern to all parties at present. China believes that no matter what framework arrangement, it should be inclusive and open, not discriminatory and exclusive; We should promote the stability of the global industrial chain supply chain, rather than damage and split the global market. Under the current situation, strengthening the open cooperation of industrial chain supply chain and preventing fragmentation is beneficial to all parties concerned and the whole world.

The first case of selling imitation guns in China was rejected. Family members: they will continue to complain.

Notice of Taizhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Province on Rejecting the Appeal

Notice of Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province on Rejecting the Appeal

Li Daiqiong is reading her son’s letter.

  one

  Family complaint

  The court previously ruled that the applicable criteria for gun identification were not legal and reasonable.

  Court rejected

  The Provisions on the Performance Appraisal of Firearms and Ammunition Involved by Public Security Organs, which was formulated by the Ministry of Public Security and issued on December 7, 2010, defined the scope, organs, standards, procedures and time limit of firearms appraisal. Non-standard guns that can’t fire standard ammunition, according to the provisions of the Criterion of Forensic Scientific Appraisal of Guns’ Injuring Power, are all regarded as guns when the muzzle specific kinetic energy of the projectiles fired is greater than or equal to 1.8 Joule/cm2. The complainant’s argument that the appraisal standard is not legal and reasonable is insufficient.

  2

  Family complaint

  The fact that 1,100 guns were seized is unclear.

  Court rejected

  The firearms involved in the case were appraised by the appraisal institutions and appraisers with appraisal qualifications in accordance with the regulations. The 66 firearms sold in the inspection and the 1,100 firearms seized indoors were non-military firearms powered by compressed gas, and the appraisal was legal and well-founded.

  three

  Family complaint

  Yan Zhiyuan only sells imitation guns, and there is no subjective intention to illegally buy and sell guns.

  Court rejected

  Defendant Yan Zhiyuan sold the above-mentioned gun-like items identified as non-military guns at a price of several hundred yuan and several thousand yuan for profit, which obviously had the subjective intention of illegally buying and selling guns. Moreover, it illegally sold guns in violation of gun management regulations, involving 1299 guns, of which 66 were sold, and 1100 seized guns were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas, which was a serious case of illegal buying and selling guns. Based on his truthful confession of the main criminal facts after being brought to justice, the accusation behavior does not constitute meritorious service, but it should be encouraged. The original judgment has given him a lighter punishment and appropriate sentencing.

  four

  Family complaint

  Asking for acquittal, even if the crime is constituted, the sentencing is too heavy, which is unequal to the sentencing of Lei Mou.

  Court rejected

  Yan Zhiyuan did not manufacture guns himself. The guns involved were bought and sold for profit. He took the initiative to buy guns from his family and contacted his family to sell guns. He independently committed the crime of illegal buying and selling guns. Based on his initiative to carry out illegal buying and selling, it cannot be considered that his plot is lighter than that of his family, which was also sold after buying.

  Lawyer’s statement

  1. In many previous simulation gun cases, the stipulation of the Ministry of Public Security that the specific kinetic energy of the muzzle is "greater than or equal to 1.8 Joule/cm2" has become the biggest core. This standard also once caused public opinion to question. In Yan Zhiyuan’s case, the standard problem is still the biggest resistance to appeal.

  2. Because the simulation guns involved in Yan Zhiyuan’s case were bought and sold in 2010-2011, this time point happened to be the time when the 1.8 Joule standard was issued by the Ministry of Public Security. On the one hand, there was a problem that people knew about the standard. On the other hand, were the simulation guns he sold before the standard was issued by the Ministry of Public Security, and were any of them in stock purchased before that?

  Li Daiqiong failed to get the expected result, and her complaint was rejected by the court. Seven years ago, her son Yan Zhiyuan was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province for illegally buying and selling guns for selling imitation guns. Yan Zhiyuan became the first party in China who was sentenced to life imprisonment for selling "toy guns".

  A year ago, his family began to complain for Yan Zhiyuan. The family believes that the criteria for gun identification applicable to the judgment are not legal and reasonable. The son only sells imitation guns, and there is no subjective intention to illegally buy or sell guns. Moreover, the facts of finding guns are unclear and the sentence is too heavy.

  Recently, the Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province issued a notice rejecting the appeal, saying that the facts of the original judgment were clear and the evidence was sufficient. According to Yan Zhiyuan’s criminal facts, nature and circumstances, the conviction and applicable law were correct, the sentencing was appropriate and the trial procedure was legal. This also means that Li Daiqiong’s complaint failed.

  Li Daiqiong said that he will continue to complain and look forward to his son’s early return home.

  Case review

  ■ August 4, 2011

  Yan Zhiyuan was arrested by the police.

  ■ June 2012

  The police in Taizhou, Zhejiang released a message and cracked the "6.23 mega-network gun trafficking case" supervised by the Ministry of Public Security. Yan Zhiyuan is one of the main personnel in the case, and was once called the "gun king".

  ■2012

  It was found through trial by the court that from September 2010 to August 2011, Yan Zhiyuan contacted through Internet QQ and sold 101 guns to Zheng Moumou, Sun Mou, Qian Moumou, Yang Mou and others through Taobao and Paipai. After identification, 66 of them were lethal and were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas. At the same time, the police also seized 1,198 kinds of guns from the rented house explained by Yan Zhiyuan, of which 1,100 were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas.

  ■ November 20, 2012

  The Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province pronounced that Yan Zhiyuan was guilty of illegally buying and selling guns, sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life.

  In the process of penalty execution

  By the decision of Zhejiang Higher People’s Court, it was reduced to fixed-term imprisonment of 20 years and three months, and the deprivation of political rights was changed to eight years.

  ■ November 1, 2017

  The first prison in Zhejiang Province put forward the suggestion of commutation. Quzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled that "it was found through trial that Yan Zhiyuan, a criminal, was able to plead guilty and repent while serving his sentence, seriously abide by the law, accept education and reform, actively participate in study, get excellent grades, actively participate in labor, have a correct attitude, obey distribution, and strive to complete labor tasks, and won seven praises." His sentence was reduced by nine months (the sentence ended on December 4, 2034).

  ■ Last August

  Li Daiqiong received a special letter from her son. In the letter, Yan Zhiyuan suggested that her family could appeal for her.

  ■ Recently

  The Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province issued a notice rejecting the appeal.

  Recalling that selling "toy guns" was sentenced to life imprisonment.

  On November 24, Chengdu, it was rainy and chilly. Li Daiqiong failed to get the result she expected. A few days ago, she saw the notice of rejection issued by the court, and her complaint for her son failed. Seven years later, she has always been puzzled: "How can a toy gun be sentenced to an indefinite period? Even if it is guilty, isn’t it enough to educate it for a year or two?"

  Son Yan Zhiyuan was arrested by the police on August 4, 2011. On the same day, Li Daiqiong was also called by the police for questioning.

  According to police investigation, Yan Zhiyuan was suspected of several cases of selling guns online. From that day on, Yan Zhiyuan failed to go home again.

  In June 2012, the police in Taizhou, Zhejiang Province released a message and cracked the "6.23 mega-network gun trafficking case" supervised by the Ministry of Public Security. Local media in Zhejiang reported that the sales network of the case spread all over the country, with more than 1,700 suspects involved. The police seized nearly 2,000 fake guns and more than 1.1 million air gun bullets, BB bullets and plastic bullets. Yan Zhiyuan is one of the main personnel in the case, and was once called the "gun king".

  It was found through trial by the court that from September 2010 to August 2011, Yan Zhiyuan contacted through Internet QQ and sold 101 guns to Zheng Moumou, Sun Mou, Qian Moumou, Yang Mou and others through Taobao and Paipai. After identification, 66 of them were lethal and were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas. At the same time, the police also seized 1,198 kinds of guns from the rented house explained by Yan Zhiyuan, of which 1,100 were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas.

  On November 20, 2012, the Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province pronounced that Yan Zhiyuan was guilty of illegally buying and selling guns, sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life. At that time, Yan Zhiyuan was 26 years old.

  Dramatic children go to prison, mothers work hard to bring up grandchildren.

  Li Daiqiong failed to attend her son’s trial. Many years ago, she divorced her husband and brought up her son in one hand. Later, her son was arrested and his girlfriend left. She had to continue to bring two twin granddaughters. Another reason is that she always thinks that her son is selling a toy gun, and there won’t be much problem. Friends also told her that the toy gun would not be too heavy, and it might even be educated at most after finding out. She didn’t even get her son a defense lawyer.

  Li Daiqiong didn’t know his son’s verdict until he received the verdict. That day, she received a letter from the court. At the end of the verdict, it said "life imprisonment", and she was instantly stunned.

  After the son was arrested, it was two years after the mother and son met again. Li Daiqiong introduced that in 2014, she took her two granddaughters to Taizhou, Zhejiang Province and met her son in prison. "The meeting was only 40 minutes, and I collapsed as soon as I met, just crying." Li Daiqiong said that his son lost a lot of weight and his face was a big circle smaller.

  It’s not just Yan Zhiyuan who has changed. Li Daiqiong’s life also changed dramatically. She needs to make a living and take care of her two granddaughters. She rented out the bedroom at home and squeezed into the living room with her granddaughters. The children slept on the sofa and she slept on the floor beside the sofa.

  Letter from my son, I hope my family will complain.

  Yan Zhiyuan also started correspondence with his mother. In many letters, Yan Zhiyuan told her daughter to study hard and reduce the burden for her family. I also told my mother that when her daughter grows up, she must be admitted to law school. Two can’t enter, but one can.

  During Yan Zhiyuan’s seven years in prison, many domestic cases of selling imitation guns, such as Aunt Tianjin’s case, Liu Dawei’s case and Yu Meng’s case, were reported by the media, which aroused public concern, and some cases were reversed accordingly.

  Yan Zhiyuan saw hope. Last August, Li Daiqiong received a special letter from her son. In the letter, Yan Zhiyuan suggested that she hoped her family could appeal for her. Once the complaint is successful, you can go home at least seven or eight years in advance. Later, Li Daiqiong found a lawyer, formally complained about his son’s case, and wrote back to his son, asking him to make a good reform in prison, and the things outside will definitely be carried out hard at home.

  The court dismissed the original judgment and said the sentence was appropriate.

  Lawyers yangweihua and Yan Huafeng became Li Daiqiong’s agents and appealed to the Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province.

  Li Daiqiong complained that the gun appraisal standard applied by the court’s previous judgment was not legal and reasonable, and Yan Zhiyuan only sold imitation guns, and there was no subjective intention to illegally buy and sell guns; The fact that 1,100 guns were seized is unclear; Asking for acquittal, even if the crime is constituted, the sentence is too heavy, which is unequal to the sentence of Lei Mou.

  But a few days ago, Li Daiqiong got a reply to her complaint, and the court rejected her complaint. The Intermediate People’s Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province stated in the notice of rejection of appeal issued on October 23, 2019 that the facts of the original judgment were clear and the evidence was sufficient. According to the facts, nature and circumstances of Yan Zhiyuan’s crime, the conviction and applicable law were correct, the sentencing was appropriate and the trial procedure was legal. Li Daiqiong’s appeal grounds do not meet the retrial conditions stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), and the original judgment should be upheld.

  The court held that the Provisions on Performance Appraisal of Firearms and Ammunition Involved by Public Security Organs, which was formulated by the Ministry of Public Security and issued on December 7, 2010, clarified the scope, organs, standards, procedures and time limits of firearms appraisal. Non-standard guns that can’t fire standard ammunition, according to the provisions of the Criterion of Forensic Scientific Appraisal of Guns’ Injuring Power, are all regarded as guns when the muzzle specific kinetic energy of the projectiles fired is greater than or equal to 1.8 Joule/cm2. The complainant’s argument that the appraisal standard is not legal and reasonable is insufficient.

  At the same time, the gun-like articles involved in the case were appraised by the appraisal institutions and appraisers with appraisal qualifications in accordance with the regulations. The 66 gun-like articles that have been bought and sold in the inspection and the 1,100 gun-like articles seized indoors are non-military guns powered by compressed gas, and the appraisal is legally well-founded.

  Defendant Yan Zhiyuan sold the above-mentioned gun-like items identified as non-military guns at a price of several hundred yuan and several thousand yuan for profit, which obviously had the subjective intention of illegally buying and selling guns. Moreover, it illegally sold guns in violation of gun management regulations, involving 1299 guns, of which 66 were sold, and 1100 seized guns were identified as non-military guns powered by compressed gas, which was a serious case of illegal buying and selling guns. Based on his truthful confession of the main criminal facts after being brought to justice, the accusation behavior does not constitute meritorious service, but it should be encouraged. The original judgment has given him a lighter punishment and appropriate sentencing.

  In addition, Yan Zhiyuan did not manufacture guns by himself, and the guns involved were bought and sold for profit. He took the initiative to buy guns from his family and contacted his family to sell guns, and independently committed the crime of illegal buying and selling guns. Based on his initiative to carry out illegal buying and selling, it cannot be considered that the plot is lighter than that of his family, which was also bought and resold. The defendant confessed the main criminal facts truthfully only after he was arrested, and the upper family voluntarily surrendered all the criminal facts. Although both of them have statutory lighter punishment circumstances, they should be given a wider punishment according to the law. It is appropriate for our court to convict and punish the defendant.

  All the reasons for Li Daiqiong’s complaint were rejected, which also means that her complaint failed.

  Lawyer’s "1.8 Joule" is the biggest difficulty in appealing.

  In the view of lawyer yangweihua, it is expected that the complaint will be rejected. "No complaint can be made overnight."

  The difficulty in appealing comes from several aspects. In many previous simulation gun cases, the stipulation of the Ministry of Public Security that the specific kinetic energy of the muzzle is "greater than or equal to 1.8 Joule/cm2" has become the biggest core. This standard also once caused public opinion to question. In Yan Zhiyuan’s case, the standard problem is still the biggest resistance to appeal.

  In addition, yangweihua said that by consulting the court files, Yan Zhiyuan also took the initiative to report when he was in the detention center, and the detention center also issued corresponding materials, suggesting a lighter punishment. However, from the final result, the court did not consider it when sentencing.

  At the same time, because the simulation guns involved in Yan Zhiyuan’s case were bought and sold in 2010-2011, this time point happened to be the time when the 1.8 Joule standard of the Ministry of Public Security was introduced. "On the one hand, there is a problem that people know about this standard, on the other hand, are these simulation guns sold by him before the standard of the Ministry of Public Security was introduced, and are the stocks purchased before this?" Yangweihua believes that these special factors should be taken into consideration in sentencing.

  Regarding the result of this appeal, yangweihua said that he would discuss with his family and consider continuing to appeal to the procuratorate or the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court. Li Daiqiong also told the Chengdu Business Daily-Red Star journalist that he would continue to complain and look forward to his son’s early return home. (Chengdu Business Daily-Red Star Journalist Du Yuquan Photojournalist Wang Hongqiang)